Republished by Blog Post Promoter
Tag Archives: evolution
EGG-LAYING BEAVER-DUCK VENOM-STINGING RADAR-SIGHT MAMMAL-THING
Republished by Blog Post Promoter
Obviously, some very clever biological engineers figured out how to make the incompatible parts of reptiles, mammals and birds with electronic sight function in a single organism some where and some when. They’re also very cute! So, if Earth “scientists” are lying to us about “evolution” what else are they lying about, and why? Read the book Alien Interview to find out.
HUMAN: AN INVASIVE SPECIES
Republished by Blog Post Promoter
-
nounAny species that has been introduced to an environment where it is not native, and that has since become a nuisance through rapid spread and increase in numbers, often to the detriment of native species.
In spite of political, religious, economic and scientific propaganda, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that the species “homo sapiens” is not indigenous to planet Earth. i.e. humans did not “evolve” here. In fact, the “theory of evolution by natural selection” is still a theory. Evolution, i.e. an ape does not “evolve” into becoming a “human”. It doesn’t work, in actual fact…. unless, a technician in a biological laboratory artificially combines the DNA with another species of life.
If the species “homo sapiens” did not originate or evolve on Earth, where did it come from? Details of where humans came from, why, when and how are found in the book ALIEN INTERVIEW:
“…evolution does not occur accidentally. It requires a great deal of technology which must be manipulated under the careful supervision of IS-BEs. Very simple examples are seen in the modification of farm animals or in
the breeding of dogs. However, the notion that human biological organisms evolved naturally from earlier ape-like forms is incorrect. No physical evidence will ever be uncovered to substantiate the notion that modern humanoid bodies evolved on this planet.
The reason is simple: the idea that human bodies evolved spontaneously from the primordial ooze of chemical interactivity in the dim mists of time is nothing more than a hypnotic lie instilled by the amnesia operation to prevent your recollection of the true origins of Mankind. Factually, humanoid bodies have existed in various forms throughout the universe for trillions of years.”
TOO MANY HUMANS?
Republished by Blog Post Promoter
Personally, I don’t think there are too many human beings on this planet> I think there are not supposed to be ANY Homo Sapiens on Earth. In spite of religious and scientific propaganda that says human “evolved” on Earth there is NO PROOF that this is true. In fact ALL the actual evidence demonstrates that the species Homo Sapiens suddenly appeared on Earth without ANY biological forbearers. The exact date is unknown. Modern Homo Sapiens certainly did not exist on Earth as recently as a mere millions years ago. A million years in the biological and geological history of Earth is staggeringly SHORT period of time: the blink of an eye.
Sharks, for example, who have an average life-span of about 60 years, like humans, have existed in the archeological record for at 400 million years or longer. They existed BEFORE dinosaurs! There is no disagreement that scales found during the Silurian Period, aged 420 million years, are from sharks. Shark scales from this period have been found in Siberia and Mongolia.
However, one of the most obvious bits of evidence that humans are not FROM Earth, and that humans do not BELONG on Earth, is that humans do not have ANY naturally occurring SYBIOTIC RELATIONSHIPS with other life forms that are beneficial to other life forms, i.e. if humans disappeared today ALL other native species of life on Earth would prosper!
So, why are there Homo Sapiens on Earth? Where did they come from? One thing is certain: humans on Earth are NOT and accident of evolution or conception. Someone, somewhere, sometime, CAUSED it.
— Lawrence R. Spencer. September, 2016
BOOK OF THE DAMNED
Republished by Blog Post Promoter
“I think we’re property.
I should say we belong to something:
That once upon a time, this earth was No-man’s Land, that other worlds explored and colonized here, and fought among themselves for possession, but that now it’s owned by something:
That something owns this earth—all others warned off.
Nothing in our own times—perhaps—because I am thinking of certain notes I have—has ever appeared upon this earth, from somewhere else, so openly as Columbus landed upon San Salvador, or as Hudson sailed up his river. But as to surreptitious visits to this earth, in recent times, or as to emissaries, perhaps, from other worlds, or voyagers who have shown every indication of intent to evade and avoid, we shall have data as convincing as our data of oil or coal-burning aerial super-constructions.
But, in this vast subject, I shall have to do considerable neglecting or disregarding, myself. I don’t see how I can, in this book, take up at all the subject of possible use of humanity to some other mode of existence, or the flattering notion that we can possibly be worth something.
Pigs, geese, and cattle.
First find out that they are owned.
Then find out the whyness of it.”
—- The Book of the Damned, by Charles Fort, [1919]
__________________________________________
- Charles Hoy Fort (August 6, 1874 – May 3, 1932) was an American writer and researcher into anomalous phenomena.
- “A procession of the damned.
- By ‘the damned’, I mean the excluded.
- We shall have a procession of data that Science has excluded.”
-
- – opening lines of The Book of the Damned
“The title of the book referred to what he termed the “damned” data – data which had been damned, or excluded, by modern science because of its not conforming to accepted guidelines. The way Fort saw it,mainstream scientists are trend followers who believe in what is accepted and popular, and never really look for a truth that may be contrary to what they believe. He also compared the close-mindedness of many scientists to that of religious fundamentalists, implying that the supposed “battle” between science and religion is just a smokescreen for the fact that, in his view, science is, in essence, simply a de facto religion. This is a theme that Fort would develop more heavily in his later works, New Lands and Lo! particularly.
Fort was one of the first major writers to deal extensively with paranormal phenomena, and in that aspect at least, The Book of the Damned should be considered an important work. It should be viewed as a formulative work, perhaps understandably, as it is his first major book. Though Fort’s uniquely acerbic writing style is already in evidence, and there are plenty of interesting phenomena to read about, Fort’s theories (as such) are only beginning to be developed.”
Fort’s comment on Darwinism:
“Darwin & Evolution In mere impressionism we take our stand. We have no positive tests nor standards. Realism in art: realism in science – they pass away. In 1859, the thing to do was to accept Darwinism; now many biologists are revolting and trying to conceive of something else. The thing to do was to accept it in its day, but Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest – Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness”, then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinism: That survivors survive.” (Damned, pp. 23-24)
Science-fiction writers of note including Philip K. Dick, Robert Heinlein, and Robert Anton Wilson were fans of the work of Charles Fort. (SEE WIKIPEDIA.ORG ARTICLE ABOUT CHARLES FORT)




