Tag Archives: evolution

BOOK OF THE DAMNED

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

“I think we’re property.

I should say we belong to something:

That once upon a time, this earth was No-man’s Land, that other worlds explored and colonized here, and fought among themselves for possession, but that now it’s owned by something:

That something owns this earth—all others warned off.

Nothing in our own times—perhaps—because I am thinking of certain notes I have—has ever appeared upon this earth, from somewhere else, so openly as Columbus landed upon San Salvador, or as Hudson sailed up his river. But as to surreptitious visits to this earth, in recent times, or as to emissaries, perhaps, from other worlds, or voyagers who have shown every indication of intent to evade and avoid, we shall have data as convincing as our data of oil or coal-burning aerial super-constructions.

But, in this vast subject, I shall have to do considerable neglecting or disregarding, myself. I don’t see how I can, in this book, take up at all the subject of possible use of humanity to some other mode of existence, or the flattering notion that we can possibly be worth something.

Pigs, geese, and cattle.

First find out that they are owned.

Then find out the whyness of it.”

—-  The Book of the Damned, by Charles Fort, [1919]

__________________________________________

Charles Hoy Fort (August 6, 1874 – May 3, 1932) was an American writer and researcher into anomalous phenomena.
“A procession of the damned.
By ‘the damned’, I mean the excluded.
We shall have a procession of data that Science has excluded.”
– opening lines of The Book of the Damned

“The title of the book referred to what he termed the “damned” data – data which had been damned, or excluded, by modern science because of its not conforming to accepted guidelines. The way Fort saw it,mainstream scientists are trend followers who believe in what is accepted and popular, and never really look for a truth that may be contrary to what they believe. He also compared the close-mindedness of many scientists to that of religious fundamentalists, implying that the supposed “battle” between science and religion is just a smokescreen for the fact that, in his view, science is, in essence, simply a de facto religion. This is a theme that Fort would develop more heavily in his later works, New Lands and Lo! particularly.

Fort was one of the first major writers to deal extensively with paranormal phenomena, and in that aspect at least, The Book of the Damned should be considered an important work. It should be viewed as a formulative work, perhaps understandably, as it is his first major book. Though Fort’s uniquely acerbic writing style is already in evidence, and there are plenty of interesting phenomena to read about, Fort’s theories (as such) are only beginning to be developed.”

Fort’s comment on Darwinism:

“Darwin & Evolution In mere impressionism we take our stand. We have no positive tests nor standards. Realism in art: realism in science – they pass away. In 1859, the thing to do was to accept Darwinism; now many biologists are revolting and trying to conceive of something else. The thing to do was to accept it in its day, but Darwinism of course was never proved: The fittest survive. What is meant by the fittest? Not the strongest; not the cleverest – Weakness and stupidity everywhere survive. There is no way of determining fitness except in that a thing does survive. “Fitness”, then, is only another name for “survival.” Darwinism: That survivors survive.” (Damned, pp. 23-24)

Science-fiction writers of note including Philip K. Dick, Robert Heinlein, and Robert Anton Wilson were  fans of the work of Charles Fort.  (SEE WIKIPEDIA.ORG ARTICLE ABOUT CHARLES FORT)

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Charles Darwin was right!  It is possible for a Duck-Billed Platypus, and other phenomenal creatures, to evolve from the primordial slime purely as an accident of  natural selection.  How could anyone ever doubt his brilliant observations?  Here is physical evidence that he was right all along!

SEE MORE MARVELS OF EVOLUTION HERE:  Enrique Gomez De Molina / Interactive Arts.

TOO MANY HUMANS?

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

the-problem

Personally, I don’t think there are too many human beings on this planet> I think there are not supposed to be ANY Homo Sapiens on Earth.  In spite of religious and scientific propaganda that says human “evolved” on Earth there is NO PROOF that this is true.  In fact ALL the actual evidence demonstrates that the species Homo Sapiens suddenly appeared on Earth without ANY biological forbearers.    The exact date is unknown.  Modern Homo Sapiens certainly did not exist on Earth as recently as a mere millions years ago.  A million years in the biological and geological history of Earth is staggeringly SHORT period of time: the blink of an eye.

Sharks, for example, who have an average life-span of about 60 years, like humans, have existed in the archeological record for at 400 million years or longer. They existed BEFORE dinosaurs! There is no disagreement that scales found during the Silurian Period, aged 420 million years, are from sharks.  Shark scales from this period have been found in Siberia and Mongolia.

sharkasaursHowever, one of the most obvious bits of evidence that humans are not FROM Earth, and that humans do not BELONG on Earth, is that humans do not have ANY naturally occurring SYBIOTIC RELATIONSHIPS with other life forms that are beneficial to other life forms, i.e. if humans disappeared today ALL other native species of life on Earth would prosper!

So, why are there Homo Sapiens on Earth?  Where did they come from?  One thing is certain:  humans on Earth are NOT and accident of evolution or conception.  Someone, somewhere, sometime, CAUSED it.

— Lawrence R. Spencer. September, 2016

EVOLUTION?

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

8731143251_7f6358c884_z“You will find “evolution” mentioned in the ancient Vedic Hymns. The Vedic texts are like folk tales or common wisdoms and superstitions gathered throughout the systems of The Domain.  These were compiled into verses, like a book of rhymes.  For every statement of truth, the verses contain as many half-truths, reversals of truth and fanciful imaginings, blended without qualification or distinction. 

The theory of evolution assumes that the motivational source of energy that animates every life form does not  exist.  It assumes that an inanimate object or a chemical concoction can suddenly become “alive” or animate accidentally or spontaneously.  Or, perhaps an electrical discharge into a pool of chemical ooze will magically spawn a self-animated entity.  

spiny black orb weaverThere is no evidence whatsoever that this is true, simply because it is not true.  Dr. Frankenstein did not really resurrect the dead into a marauding monster, except in the imagination of the IS-BE who wrote a fictitious story one dark and stormy night.  

No Western scientist ever stopped to consider who, what, where, when or how this animation happens.  Complete ignorance, denial or unawareness of the spirit as the source of life force required to animate inanimate objects or cellular tissue is the sole cause of failures  in Western medicine. 

110.Planthopper nymphIn addition, evolution does not occur accidentally. It requires a great deal of technology which must be manipulated under the careful supervision of IS-BEs.  Very simple examples are seen in the modification of farm animals or in the breeding of dogs.  However, the notion that human biological organisms evolved naturally from earlier ape-like forms is incorrect.  No physical evidence will ever be uncovered to substantiate the notion that modern humanoid bodies evolved on this planet. 

The reason is simple: the idea that human bodies evolved spontaneously from the primordial ooze of chemical interactivity in the dim mists of time is nothing more than a hypnotic lie instilled by the amnesia operation to prevent your recollection of the true origins of Mankind.  Factually, humanoid bodies have existed in various forms throughout the universe for trillions of years.”

— Airl (Officer, Pilot and Engineer of The Domain) from the book ALIEN INTERVIEW   Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

VISIT THE WEBSITE and BLOG for the book at www.alieninterview.org and www.alieninterview.org/blog

EDGE OF EVOLUTION

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

As I revealed in my book THE OZ FACTORS in 1999, the “theory of evolution” is essentially a bunch of bunk.  Darwin based his THEORY largely on geology, rather than biology.  During the intervening decades the new religion of “science”, as well as old religion (The Pope) have accepted and championed the unfounded THEORY that life on Earth spontaneously “evolves” to create new and unique species of life.  The problem is that all the EVIDENCE demonstrates this has never happened, without the intervention of “intelligent design”, i.e. people, aliens, gods, etc..  The theory of evolution another of the fundamental lies (false information) that trap and enslave the minds human beings on Earth.

Here is a brief description of a new book published recently by the brilliant biologist and writer. Michael Behe,  that I referenced in THE OZ FACTORS:

When Michael J. Behe’s first book, Darwin’s Black Box, was published in 1996, it launched the intelligent design movement. Critics howled, yet hundreds of thousands of readers — and a growing number of scientists — were intrigued by Behe’s claim that Darwinism could not explain the complex machinery of the cell.

Now, in his long-awaited follow-up, Behe presents far more than a challenge to Darwinism: He presents the evidence of the genetics revolution — the first direct evidence of nature’s mutational pathways — to radically redefine the debate about Darwinism.

How much of life does Darwin’s theory explain? Most scientists believe it accounts for everything from the machinery of the cell to the history of life on earth. Darwin’s ideas have been applied to law, culture, and politics.

But Darwin’s theory has been proven only in one sense: There is little question that all species on earth descended from a common ancestor. Overwhelming anatomical, genetic, and fossil evidence exists for that claim. But the crucial question remains: How did it happen? Darwin’s proposed mechanism — random mutation and natural selection — has been accepted largely as a matter of faith and deduction or, at best, circumstantial evidence. Only now, thanks to genetics, does science allow us to seek direct evidence. The genomes of many organisms have been sequenced, and the machinery of the cell has been analyzed in great detail. The evolutionary responses of microorganisms to antibiotics and humans to parasitic infections have been traced over tens of thousands of generations.

As a result, for the first time in history Darwin’s theory can be rigorously evaluated. The results are shocking. Although it can explain marginal changes in evolutionary history, random mutation and natural selection explain very little of the basic machinery of life. The “edge” of evolution, a line that defines the border between random and nonrandom mutation, lies very far from where Darwin pointed. Behe argues convincingly that most of the mutations that have defined the history of life on earth have been nonrandom.

Although it will be controversial and stunning, this finding actually fits a general pattern discovered by other branches of science in recent decades: The universe as a whole was fine-tuned for life. From physics to cosmology to chemistry to biology, life on earth stands revealed as depending upon an endless series of unlikely events. The clear conclusion: The universe was designed for life.