Tag Archives: criminals


Republished by Blog Post Promoter


Do you really understand the shit you’re being told about the so-called “fiscal cliff”?  If you do not understand the how the system of private banks operate and who controls our money supply, you are being filled full of shit every day by your government.  The World Bank and Federal Reserve Banking system are controlled by Private Bankers (private corporations).  They lend money to individuals, corporations a government and charge interest.  The “money” the loan is just paper.  It isn’t backed by anything of value.  It’s just a bunch of numbers in a ledger.  The private banks are NOT controlled by any governments.  They are criminal rackets.

If you’re tired of paying more and more and more taxes every year to pay the interest on “loans” these criminal bankers make to governments, then we can do something about it.  The first step is to educate yourself about how the criminal private banking system works.  Where you know it or not you are a slave to private corporations called “banks”.  All of your “taxes” are spent to pay the “interest” on “loans” made to our government by private bankers.  This will continue to grow for the rest of your life and that of your grandchildren until we refuse to allow this criminal system to continue.  Here are a couple of introductory articles:




Republished by Blog Post Promoter

The General Motors streetcar conspiracy (also known as the National City Lines conspiracy) refers to allegations and convictions in relation to a program by General Motors (GM) and a number of other companies to purchase and dismantle streetcars (trams/trolleys) and electric trains in many cities across the United States and replace them with bus services. The lack of clear information about exactly what occurred has led to intrigue, inaccuracy and conspiracy theories with some citing it as the primary reason for the virtual elimination of effective public transport in many American cities by the 1970s. The story has been explored several times in print, film and other media, notably in Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Taken for a Ride and The End of Suburbia.

During the period from 1936 to 1950, National City Lines and Pacific City Lines—with investment from GM, Firestone Tire, Standard Oil of California, Phillips Petroleum, Mack Trucks, and the Federal Engineering Corporation—bought over 100 electric surface-traction systems in 45 cities including Baltimore, Newark, Los Angeles, New York City, Oakland and San Diego and converted them into bus operation.

In 1946, Edwin J. Quinby, a retired naval lieutenant commander, alerted transportation officials across the country to what he called “a careful, deliberately planned campaign to swindle you out of your most important and valuable public utilities—your Electric Railway System”. GM and other companies were subsequently convicted in 1949 of conspiring to monopolize the sale of buses and related products via a complex network of linked holding companies including National City Lines and Pacific City Lines. They were also indicted, but acquitted of conspiring to monopolize the ownership of these companies.

By the time of the 1973 oil crisis, controversial new testimony was presented to a United States Senate inquiry into the causes of the decline of streetcar systems in the U.S. This alleged that there was a wider conspiracy—by GM in particular—to destroy effective public transport systems in order to increase sales of automobiles and that this was implemented with great effect to the detriment of many cities.

Only a small handful of U.S. cities have surviving effective rail-based urban transport systems based on streetcar or trams, including Newark, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Pittsburgh, and Boston. There is now general agreement that GM and other companies were indeed actively involved in a largely unpublicized program to purchase many streetcar systems and convert them to buses, which they supplied. There is also acknowledgment that the Great Depression, the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, labor unrest, market forces, rapidly increasing traffic congestion, taxation policies that favored private vehicle ownership, urban sprawl, and general enthusiasm for the automobile played a role. One author recently summed the situation up stating “Clearly, GM waged a war on electric traction. It was indeed an all out assault, but by no means the single reason for the failure of rapid transit. Also, it is just as clear that actions and inactions by government contributed significantly to the elimination of electric traction.”



Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Does the following definition of a “derivative” sound like something you would spend you hard earned money on?  Or, does it sound like a complex shell-game designed to steal your hard earned money from you?  If you are stupid enough to believe that “Wall Street” is anything more than a criminal racket, you deserve to pay your tax dollars to bail the mutherfuckers out of the billions of dollars they’ve squandered on this elaborate scam.  ARE YOU TIRED OF THE BULLSHIT YET?

“A derivative instrument is a “contract between two parties that specifies conditions-in particular, dates and the resulting values of the underlying variables-under which payments, or payoffs, are to be made between the parties.  One of the oldest derivatives is rice futures, which have been traded on the Dojima Rice Exchange since the eighteenth century.  Derivatives are broadly categorized by the relationship between the underlying asset and the derivative (e.g., forwardoptionswap); the type of underlying asset (e.g., equity derivatives,foreign exchange derivativesinterest rate derivatives, commodity derivatives, or credit derivatives); the market in which they trade (e.g., exchange-traded or over-the-counter); and their pay-off profile.

Derivatives can be used for speculating purposes (“bets”) or to hedge (“insurance”). For example, a speculator may sell deep in-the-money naked calls on a stock, expecting the stock price to plummet, but exposing himself to potentially unlimited losses. Very commonly, companies buy currency forwards in order to limit losses due to fluctuations in the exchange rate of two currencies. — Wikipedia


Republished by Blog Post Promoter




delivered daily to your door!


The News will keep you well informed!

 Good news is never fit to print;

Bad News Headlines make a mint!

The Press make sure you’ll get upset

each time you watch your TV set.




It must be true…. it was printed in a book!




The Press makes sure that we’re “aware”….

 Shocking love-life exposes!

Who will they prosecute today?


The Press will judge and execute!

 Is Free Speech an equal right?

Only for those with financial might

to pay the advertising fees.

The Press is told who to appease.

 Lies and rumors, the “news” abounds –

they’ll make it up when there’s none around.

“The truth be damned!  I’m a reporter…

It’s my job to cause disorder”!

 Like l0bsters in a bubbling pot

who claw and pull to reach the top –

free from miserable despair,

The Press is boiling you in fear!

 Every day we all begin

a bright new hopeful day.

Life’s a game we all can win.

It’s lots of fun to play.

 Wake up! Don’ get sucked in!

Reporters wearing pearly grins

tell you that life’s all bad;

The Press are all completely mad!

 Turn off your TV! Enjoy your day.

In spite of what “the experts” say,

there is no need to be afraid.

Live and Love another day!


A poem by Lawrence R. Spencer. 2013


Republished by Blog Post Promoter

“It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.”

— Mark Twain

“Modern-day political/economic parasites provide an excellent example of the distortion of information and economies created by vested interests.

For instance, the number of parasitic “professionals” in the United States has increased dramatically in recent years. Each of these professions represent a vested interest:

Number of Lawyers in 1960 equaled 260,000; in 1990 756,000

Number of Political Lobbyists in 1960 equaled 365, in 1990 40,111

Number of Trade Associations in 1960 equaled 4,900; in 1990 23,000

Number of Federal Regulatory Staff in 1960 equaled 70,000; in 1990 130,000

There are now 400 lobbyists in Washington for every Senator! The number of federal lawsuits has roughly tripled in the last 30 years. Forty-two percent of the members of the House of Representatives are lawyers, compared to only fifteen percent in an 18-country average outside the United States. Each of these lawyers and lobbyists are trying to influence the creation or enforcement of laws to serve the vested interests they represent.

The financial distortion and stress on the national economy created by these professionals is staggering.

There are two ways to get rich:

1/ produce something valuable from which you create new wealth, or

2/ try to get a share of somebody else’s wealth.

These professions, by setting themselves up as middlemen in our economy each take a share of our wealth. Of course, these parasites think very highly of their own work and demand very high wages.

It is estimated that the cost of paying for federal regulation, including the residual work involved in processing the enormous amount of paperwork required to comply with newly created government regulation–which often requires the services of a lawyer, since these regulations are all written in legal language that only lawyers understand–costs the American taxpayers about $4,000 per household, or $392 billion, a year.”

— Excerpt from THE OZ FACTORS by Lawrence R. Spencer.

The U.S. Congress has long been dominated by lawyer-politicians. “From 1780 to 1930, two thirds of the senators and about half of the House of Representatives were lawyers; the percentage seems to have stayed fairly stable” (Friedman 1985: 647). . . . at the beginning of the 101st Congress in 1989, 184 members (42%) of the U.S. House of Representatives were lawyers (47% of the Democrats and 35 % of the Republicans). Sixty-three senators were lawyers, roughly equally distributed between the two parties (Ornstein, Mann, and Malbin 1990: 20-21, 26-27). At the beginning of the 102nd Congress in January, 1991, 244 of the 535 members of both houses (46%) claimed attorney as their profession.

. . .too many lawyers cause the law not to be made in a commonsense way but in a legalistic way. Process is worshiped over result because the lawyers get paid more for the process than the result. What could be more enjoyable to a lawyer than arguing the law after making the law which to be argued—as a legislator.  Because lawyers control all legal rulemaking an increase in the number of lawyers does not cause a reduction in their individual activity. It simply increases their percentage take of the American economy.

Lawyer reform is in order!