Category Archives: FREE ADVICE

Free Advice about Life, Universe and Other Stuff from Lawrence R. Spencer

THE FUNDING OF ENEMIES

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Antony Cyril Sutton (February 14, 1925 – June 17, 2002) was a British-born economist, historian, and writer. Sutton studied at the universities of London, Göttingen, and California, and received his D.Sc. from the University of Southampton. He was an economics professor at California State University, Los Angeles and a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution from 1968 to 1973. During his time at the Hoover Institution, he wrote the major study Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (in three volumes), arguing that the West played a major role in developing the Soviet Union from its very beginnings up until the present time (1970). Sutton argued that the Soviet Union‘s technological and manufacturing base — which was then engaged in supplying the Viet Cong – was built by United States corporations and largely funded by US taxpayers. Steel and iron plants, the GAZ automobile factory – a Ford subsidiary, located in eastern Russia – and many other Soviet industrial enterprises were, according to Sutton, built with the help or technical assistance of the United States or U.S. corporations. He argued further that the Soviet Union’s acquisition of MIRV technology was made possible by receiving (from U.S. sources) machining equipment for the manufacture of precision ball bearings, necessary to mass-produce MIRV-enabled missiles.

In 1973, Sutton published a popularized, condensed version of the three volumes called National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union and was thereby[citation needed] forced out of the Hoover Institution. His conclusion from his research on the issue was that the conflicts of the Cold War were “not fought to restrain communism”, since the United States, through financing the Soviet Union “directly or indirectly armed both sides in at least Korea and Vietnam”; rather, these wars were organised in order “to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts”.[1] The update to this text, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, looked at the role of technology transfers up to the 1980s. Appendix B of that text contained the text of his 1972 testimony before Subcommittee VII of the Platform Committee of the Republican Party where he summarized the essential aspects of his overall research:

In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all — perhaps 90-95 percent — came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union. Its industrial and its military capabilities. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance.[2]

Sutton’s next three major published books Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Wall Street and FDR detailed Wall Street’s involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution (in order to destroy Russia as an economic competitor and turn it into “a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control”[3]) as well as its decisive contributions to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose policies he assessed as being essentially the same, namely “corporate socialism” planned by the big corporations.[4] Sutton concluded that this was all part of the economic power elites‘ “long-range program of nurturing collectivism”[1] and fostering “corporate socialism” in order to ensure “monopoly acquisition of wealth”, because it “would fade away if it were exposed to the activity of a free market”.[5] In his view, the only solution to prevent such abuse in the future was that “a majority of individuals declares or acts as if it wants nothing from government, declares it will look after its own welfare and interests”, or specifically that “a majority finds the moral courage and the internal fortitude to reject the something-for-nothing con game and replace it by voluntary associations, voluntary communes, or local rule and decentralized societies”.[1] In Sutton’s own words he was “persecuted but never prosecuted” for his research and subsequent publication of his findings.

In the early 1980s, Sutton used a combination of public-domain information on Skull and Bones (such as Yale yearbooks) and previously unreleased documents sent to him by Charlotte Iserbyt, whose father was a Skull and Bones member,[6] to speculate that it had played an important role in coordinating the political and economic relationships underlying the historical events he (Sutton) wrote of in his previous works. He published his speculations as America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones – which, according to Sutton, was his most important work.

In his book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (New York: Viking Press;1970), Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote:

For impressive evidence of Western participation in the early phase of Soviet economic growth, see Antony C. Sutton’s Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1917–1930, which argues that ‘Soviet economic development for 1917–1930 was essentially dependent on Western technological aid’ (p.283), and that ‘at least 95 per cent of the industrial structure received this assistance.’ (p. 348).

Professor Richard Pipes, of Harvard, said in his book, Survival Is Not Enough: Soviet Realities and America’s Future (Simon & Schuster;1984):

In his three-volume detailed account of Soviet Purchases of Western Equipment and Technology …” Sutton comes to conclusions that are uncomfortable for many businessmen and economists. For this reason his work tends to be either dismissed out of hand as ‘extreme’ or, more often, simply ignored

THE RIGHT TO BE HAPPY

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

photo art by bugdown

IF YOU HAVE HIDDEN ANGER INSIDE, IT MEANS THAT SOMEONE NEAR IS ATTACKING YOU.  THEY MAY BE HIDDEN FROM VIEW.  SOMETIMES THEY’RE IN PLAIN SIGHT.

DO THE FOLLOWING:

FIND OUT WHO THEY ARE.

THEN, HANDLE THEM SO THEY CAN’T HARM YOU.

OR, GET AWAY FROM THEM.  (OR BOTH)

YOU’LL KNOW WHO WHEN YOU START FEELING HAPPIER WHEN THEY’RE OUT OF YOUR LIFE!

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE HAPPY!

WHAT IS LOVE?

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

WHAT IS LOVE

“Love” is not a good word.  I don’t like it because it has too many different definitions! Most of the time people use this word in a sexual context, which is a very small and limited definition.  So, I spent a little time to study the different definitions of “love”.  Here is what I found out:

 Here is the dictionary definition of “love”:

 1 a (1) :  strong affection for another arising out of kinship or personal ties < maternal love for a child > (2) :  attraction based on sexual desire :  affection and tenderness felt by lovers (3) :  affection based on admiration, benevolence, or common interests < love for his old schoolmates >

    b :  an assurance of affection < give her my love >

2 :  warm attachment, enthusiasm, or devotion < love of the sea >

3 a :  the object of attachment, devotion, or admiration < baseball was his first love >

   b (1) :  a beloved person :  darling —often used as a term of endearment (2) British —used as an informal term of address

4 a :  unselfish loyal and benevolent concern for the good of another: as (1) :  the fatherly concern of God for humankind (2) :  brotherly concern for others

   b :  a person’s adoration of God

5 :  a god or personification of love

 The origin of the word “love” in English is from the Old English word lufu; akin to Old High German luba, or Old English lēof (dear), Latin lubēre, libēre, which means “to please”.

 The Greeks used the word “agape” to express a purely spiritual love.  

The word “Platonic” is Intellectual love, like the love of Art, or Beauty, or love of Learning, etc…  This also applies to a genuine affinity or admiration between non-sexual relationships, as between friends, or companions.

 “Amorous” and the Greek word “Eros” (erotic) are words for sexual or romantic love.  For example, it is very easy for sexual partners to feel “amorous” toward each other, which is simply the “attraction” or “chemistry” caused by the biological programs inherent in many life forms.  However, this does necessarily include a perception or understanding that there are spiritual beings inhabiting the bodies of the “love makers”. 

The word “affinity”, which is the perception of how CLOSE or how DISTANT one feels emotionally, intellectually, spiritually or physically toward a thing, a being, or subject, or idea is a more accurate definition for non-sexual “love”. The CLOSEST that two entities can BE is to BE THE SAME, i.e. there is NO Distance between them. 

In the book Alien Interview, the UFO pilot, Airl, uses the word “admiration”, which she says Is-Bes all desire more than ANY other quality.  

“Another common denominator of IS-BEs (spiritual beings) is that admiration of one’s own illusions by others is very desirable.  If the desired admiration is not forthcoming, the IS-BE will keep creating the illusion in an attempt to get admiration.”

Admiration means:

archaic :  wonder

2 :  an object of esteem

3 :  delighted or astonished approbation

4: : a feeling of great respect and approval 

There are words like “devotion” and “adoration” or “worship” that express a very intense “admiration” that contain “reverence”, “honor” or “respect”. 

Then there are the concepts of “care” and “compassion” and “benevolence” which are often used for the feeling or emotion of mother and child, or between friends and companion, or by an individual for other members of their own race, or for life forms, or the universe at large.   

This may be a quality of “love” of god for its own creations.  This necessarily implies the willingness and ability to be Responsible for the creation and continued existence of what has been created. This kind of “love” may be all-pervasive, and eternal. 

Ultimately, each individual has a personal experience, feeling or understanding of what “love” means for them.  There may be as many definitions of “love” as there are beings who create or experience it.

— Lawrence R. Spencer. 2014.

HALLOWEEN IS FOR DISEMBODIED BEINGS

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

A “MUST READ” FOR HALLOWEEN…..This book is dedicated to all living beings who expect to die sometime and to all of the dead people who ever lived who may still be living somewhere, sometime, somehow. This book is also dedicated to all of the people who are living that may need some ideas about what to do with themselves after they die. Finally, this book is dedicated to all the people who will soon be living by virtue of one or more of the following circumstances: birth, rebirth, resurrection, reincarnation, transconfiguration, cryogenic resuscitation, invasion of alien beings, angels falling out of grace, an act of one or more gods, transformation or transmigration, arrival from a different time / space / universe / plane of existence, unimaginable others, Whoever you were, are, or will be, I trust that you will enjoy the “Rest of Eternity”.   — Lawrence R. Spencer

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

1001 Things to Do While You're Dead | [Lawrence Spencer]

Listen to the AUDIOBOOK  — Narrated by Kendra Hoffman