Tag Archives: DNA


Republished by Blog Post Promoter


One more small thing…..  What the “Frankenstein Theory” of biological engineering fails to consider when they attempt to resurrect a creature from the “dead” in a laboratory is this:  where is the Spiritual Entity that will “animate” the dead, organic tissue of the creature?  How can you covert a dead or dormant creature into a living organism without the “animating  life force” of a Spiritual Being?  It has never been done in a laboratory on Earth because “scientists” are not aware of the Spirit that is the “Source of Life” for every animated, or living creature!


Republished by Blog Post Promoter


(According to Earth “scientists”), genes are the fundamental units of inheritance in living organisms. Together, they hold all the information necessary to reproduce a given organism and to pass on genetic traits to its offspring.

Biologists have long debated what constitutes a gene in molecular terms but one useful definition is a region of DNA that carries that code necessary to make a molecular chain called a polypeptide. These chains link together to form proteins and so are the bricks and mortar out of which all organism are constructed.

Given this crucial role, it is no surprise that an ongoing goal in biology is to work out the total number of protein-coding genes necessary to construct a given organism. Biologists think the yeast genome contains about 5300 coding genes and a nematode worm genome contains about 20,470.

But the number for humans has been the subject of constant revision since biologists first began the task of estimating them in the 1960s. Then, they believed humans could have as many as 2 million protein-coding genes. But by the time the human genome project began in the late 1990s, the highest estimates put the number at 100,000 and the number has continued to shrink.

That’s an interesting result that is partly a reflection of the state of genomics. The human genome is by no means fully defined and biologists are still in the process of refining their gene models and withdrawing genes in the process.

Indeed, in the most recent update of the genome release, geneticists have withdrawn 328 of the 2000 genes that Ezkurdia, Tress and co identify as potentially non-coding.

And on this evidence, the human genome is set to get smaller still. “Our evidence suggests that the final number of true protein coding genes in the reference genome may lie closer to 19,000 than to 20,000.”

Which means that humans have fewer protein-coding genes even than nematode worms.

Geneticists long ago debunked the idea that more complex organisms require more genes. The water flea, for example, has 31,000 genes, the most in any animal, while the organism with the largest genome is thought to be the Paris jabonica, a rare flowering plant native to Japan.

The fact that the human genome is so parsimonious raises an interesting question. What exactly is it about the human genome that gives rise to our staggering complexity, in the brain for example, compared to other animals such as monkeys, worms or even water fleas?

A good answer to that question will win prizes!

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1312.7111 : The Shrinking Human Protein Coding Complement: Are There Fewer Than 20,000


Republished by Blog Post Promoter

are-there-too-many-peopleDefinition:  invasive species

In spite of political, religious, economic and scientific propaganda, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that the species “homo sapiens” is not indigenous to planet Earth.  i.e. humans did not “evolve” here.  In fact, the “theory of evolution by natural selection” is still a theory.  Evolution, i.e. an ape does not “evolve” into becoming a “human”.  It doesn’t work, in actual fact…. unless, a technician in a biological laboratory artificially combines the DNA with another species of life.

If the species “homo sapiens” did not originate or evolve on Earth, where did it come from?  Details of where humans came from, why, when and how are found in the book ALIEN INTERVIEW:

“…evolution does not occur accidentally. It requires a great deal of technology which must be manipulated under the careful supervision of IS-BEs. Very simple examples are seen in the modification of farm animals or in ALIEN INTERVIEW, edited by Lawrence R. Spencerthe breeding of dogs. However, the notion that human biological organisms evolved naturally from earlier ape-like forms is incorrect. No physical evidence will ever be uncovered to substantiate the notion that modern humanoid bodies evolved on this planet.

The reason is simple: the idea that human bodies evolved spontaneously from the primordial ooze of chemical interactivity in the dim mists of time is nothing more than a hypnotic lie instilled by the amnesia operation to prevent your recollection of the true origins of Mankind. Factually, humanoid bodies have existed in various forms throughout the universe for trillions of years.”


Republished by Blog Post Promoter

If you are inhabiting the body of a human being on planet Earth,  you are 99% deaf and blind.  
However, if you are NOT inhabiting the body of a human being, you may be able to SEE!
“Consider that you can see less than 1% of the electromagnetic spectrum and hear less than 1% of the acoustic spectrum. As you read this, you are traveling at 220 km/sec across the galaxy. 90% of the cells in your body carry their own microbial DNA and are not “you.” The atoms in your body are 99.9999999999999999% empty space and none of them are the ones you were born with. Human beings have 46 chromosomes, 2 less than the common potato. …all the beautiful colors you see represent less than 1% of the electromagnetic spectrum.”
— NASA Lunar Science Institute, 2012