Tag Archives: president

EXPEDIENCY

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

 

EXPEDIENCY

ALIEN INTERVIEW“A priesthood, or prison guards, were used to help reinforce the idea that an individual is only a biological body and is not an Immortal Spiritual Being.  The individual has no identity.  The individuals have no past lives.  The individual has no power.  Only the gods have power.  And, the gods are a contrivance of the priests who intercede between men and the gods they serve.  Men are slaves to the dictates of the priests who threaten eternal spiritual punishment if men do not obey them. What else would one expect on a prison planet where all prisoners have amnesia, and the priests themselves are prisoners?”

“Anyone who is not willing or able to submit to mindless  economic, political and religious servitude as a tax-paying worker in the class system of the “Old Empire” are “untouchable” and sentenced to receive memory wipe-out and permanent imprisonment on Earth.”

‘It is my personal belief that the truth should not be sacrificed on the altar of political, religious or economic expediency.” 

— Airl, from the Top Secret interview transcripts published in the book ALIEN INTERVIEW      Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

DEFINITIONexpedient —

noun:   a means to an end; not necessarily a principled or ethical one

expediency:

noun:   the quality of being suited to the end in view

PRESIDENTIAL SELECTION

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

presidentsBefore you waste your time voting for a President, remember that every US president (except Van Buren) was related by blood to all the others, and to the “Royal Family” of England.  Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are cousins.

The US and world government is controlled by the vested interests of a “Global Financial, Military, Corporate Complex”.  Elections have not influence over The Rothschilds banking system, Wall Street, The Federal Reserve, the Pentagon, Global Corporations, bureaucracy,  the CIA, private military Black Ops contractors, etc., etc., etc..   Your energy is better spent on preparing your mind and spirit to endure, avoid and escape from the inevitable chaos caused by the psychopaths who control the physical universe.

ALL US PRESIDENTS ARE COUSINS

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

DYNASTY-HEADS-USAjpgDEFINITIONS:

DYNASTY is a sequence of rulers from the same family, usually in the context of a feudal or monarchical system but sometimes also appearing in elective republics.” dynasty (n.) mid-15c. (earlier dynastia, late 14c.), from Middle French dynastie and directly from Late Latin dynastia, from Greek dynasteia power, lordship, sovereignty,” from dynastes ruler, chief,” from dynasthai have power.”

COUSIN: “a person belonging to the same extended family.”

All US Presidents (except one) have been proven to be related to each other and to King John of England (1166 – 1216 A.D.), the villainous king of the Robin Hood stories.  Who was King John?  John Lackland was the fourth child of Henry II. Short and fat, he was jealous of his dashing brother Richard I whom he succeeded. He was cruel, self-indulgent, selfish and avaricious, and the raising of punitive taxes united all the elements of society, clerical and lay, against him. The Pope excommunicated him. On 15th June 1215 at Runnymede the barons compelled John to sign Magna Carta, the Great Charter, which reinstated the rights of all his subjects. John died – from over-eating – a fugitive from all his enemies. He has been termed “the worst English king”.

This means that the entire history of Democratic Presidential elections, beginning the George Washington, were rigged.  American immigrants, who invaded and plundered North America killed 900,000,000 Indigenous Natives, primarily through disease and murder.  The Invaders eventually defeated the British armies during the Revolutionary War, with the help of France, an ancient and powerful enemy of England.

A new “democracy” was established in America.  However, anyone who was NOT a direct descendent of King John of England was not eligible to be “elected” to become President.  Therefore, they are all a member of a BRITISH / AMERICAN DYNASTY.  Factually, the “peasants” in America we little different than Egyptian slaves being asked to “vote” for the new Pharaoh every 4 years.  Essentially, US Presidential elections are a hoax and a scam designed to maintain power and control by the “royal family” of England.

READ THIS LINK FOR DETAILS — https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/how-all-presidents-are-related-to-king-john/

“It should be noted that Americans whose ancestors came from continental Europe in the colonial period and the 19th Century are unlikely to easily delineate descent from Charlemagne in their background. There was a separation of classes in Europe and the blood of the rulers seldom flowed legitimately into the blood of the nobility and commoners…”  –Jewels of the Crown – “A newsletter of the Order of the Crown of Charlemagne in the United States of America”   (Note:  Passing legitimate blood type is not the same as being “related” or cousins…)

POLITICAL PROCESS

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

“Since the French Revolution, a political system has been created to satisfy the restless revolutionary spirit of the people in a more orderly and cost-effective fashion (from the viewpoint of the aristocracy). Democracy, as practiced in the United States, uses a process for the peaceful overthrow of “the king” every four years. Factually, however, the President is not elected by the votes of the popular majority, as the voting population has been educated to believe, but by the Electoral College System.

However, even the Electoral College System has quirks, as noted by John Richard Stephens in his book, “Weird History 101”. In the 1824 election, Andrew Jackson received 50,551 more popular votes and 15 more Electoral College votes than his opponent, John Quincy Adams, but Adams won the election. Although Jackson got more electoral votes, it wasn’t enough for a majority because the electoral votes were divided amongst several candidates. So the decision went to the House of Representatives who chose Adams as President.

This political process enables peasants to exercise the illusion that they can cast a vote to satiate their revolutionary lust to overthrow the incumbent “king” on a periodic basis. However, the process is set to ensure that the aristocratic vested interests of the great and powerful can conduct business as usual without too much inconvenient disruption from the peasants.

               The most frightening and ponderous condition of humanity is that so many beings on this planet have so little self-respect or are apparently just so bored with existence, that they would follow a military madman like Alexander, Ch’in Shi, Caesar, Ghengis, Columbo, Napoleon or other criminals. These “leaders” and “heroes” are all cast from the same hideously deformed mold of maniacal self-importance. Each of them were notorious for sexual excess or perversion. Their souls are bathed in blood-red brutality.

               The quality for which they should be remembered is not “greatness”. The stench of rotting corpses, trampled in the muddy ruins of painful carnage is their only lasting legacy.

               The logic of the mighty-macho-male-muscle-worship was aesthetically glorified by the Greeks in the gymnasium and tempered in the Olympic stadium. It was practiced in battle by Alexander the Great, emulated by the Roman infantry, artfully perfected by Ghengis Khan and contested with tanks in World War II by its modern disciples, Rommel and Patton.

               The gory celebrations of slaughter staged by Caesar in the coliseum to amuse the citizens with hordes of gladiators hacking each other to death in hand-to-hand fighting, were inspired by the same mindset that stirred the murderous souls of the Spanish Conquistadors, tramping over the diseased and putrefied bodies of their victims to cart off the gold of devastated empires.”

— Excerpt from THE OZ FACTORS, by Lawrence R. Spencer

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

FULL FRONTAL HYPOCRISY

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

hy·poc·ri·sy (hĭ-pŏkˈrĭ-sē)  noun pl. hypocrisies (hy·poc·ri·sies)

  • The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.

  • An act or instance of such falseness.

Origin: from Late Latin hypocrisis, play-acting, pretense

Hypocrite, n. One who, profession virtues that he does not respect secures the advantage of seeming to be what he despises.” – Ambrose Bierce

The true hypocrite is the one who ceases to perceive his deception, the one who lies with sincerity” – Andre Gide

Hypocrisy can afford to be magnificent in its promises, for never intending to go beyond promise, it costs nothing” – Edward Burke

Corruption and hypocrisy ought not to be inevitable products of democracy, as they undoubtedly are today” – Mahatma Gandhi

He (Thomas Paine) saw oppression on every hand; injustice everywhere; hypocrisy at the altar; venality on the bench, tyranny on the throne; and with a splendid courage he espoused the cause of the weak against the strong” – Robert Greene Ingersoll

Woe unto you, scribes and *Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.” – (Matthew 23:14)

*(Note: the word “pharisee” has come into semi-common usage in English to describe a hypocritical and arrogant person who places the letter of the law above its spirit.)